Moving on to Honduras

   We have now completed our visit to Guatemala and El Salvador. We were able to visit the Canadian gold mine operating in San Marcos. The company here is called Montana Explorations but the owner of that company is Goldcorp, registered in Canada. It is a much larger mine that we had realized and there are a number of serious questions about the contamination (especially of water) and the treatment of the surrounding communities. According to a report we received yesterday, one woman who has been opposing the mine -- now operating for several years -- was shot in the head earlier this week. We met with representatives of these woman while in San Marcos. They are poor campesinos without much education, who have seen their lives turned upside down since the mine arrived.
   Yesterday we were able to visit a second gold mine operated by the same company near the El Salvador border. While it is not yet operating, the infrastructure is well advanced and they hope to go inter operation in another few months. There are serious questions here about contamination of water because the mountain where the mine will operate is impregnated throughout with water and the discharge from the mine would be into streams that feed a river that then goes into a very large lage that occupies both sides of the Guatemala-El Salvador border. About 25,000 families live along the shore on the El Salvador side and are fearful that the lake will be affected by the discharges from the mine and that the fish in the lake will die. Several fishing cooperatives cultivate talapia in the lake and most families either live off the fishing or at least feed themselves from the lake which has an abundance of species.
  We were also able to speak with representatives from an NGO in San Salvador which is monitoring the situation in the Cabañas region of El Salvador where a Canadian mining company is suing the Salvadoran government for 10 million dollars for having denied permission to operate. Another American company did the same thing just a few days and for the same amount. It is will probably take quite along time for the issue to be resolved through the Free Trade Agreement mediation processes.  Meanwhile in that same area several people have been assassinated in the area over the past year -- all of them leading opponents of the mine there. While the mine itself has not been identified as directly responsible for the deaths, it is fairly clear that the conflict between those who support the mine and those who oppose it has played a role in creating a violence-prone climate.
   The representative of the Canadian embassy in Guatemala, with whom we met several days ago, minimized the importance of the mining dispute even though the United Nations special relator on mining who visited Guatemala a few weeks ago met with two major manifestations of opposition to the mines -- one group is officially calculated to have included 10,000 people and the other 15,000. The indigenous people of Guatemala are are solidly against mining in their territory -- especially in the western regions of San Marcos and Huehuetenango. 
  Later today we will begin our visit of Honduras where there are several Canadian mining projects. We are also interested in the role the Canadian government and Canadian business interests may have played in the troubles that have plagued Honduras over the past year and that led to a government coup. 
  More later

Visit to Central America

    I have not entered any new material for some time now and it will be difficult to post very much in the coming days.
However I do want to bring anyone visiting this site up to date.
    Currently three members of the Social Justice Committee of Montreal (myself included) are visiting Central America. I am sitting here in the middle of Guatemala City after spending several days visiting the western region of  Guatemala, talking with communities affected by mining companies there.  Later in the week we will begin visiting other Central American countries as well.
    The situation is serious and the people are more and more organized. There will be more to say later in the month.
     Meanwhile I hope everyone is enjoying the summer and some measure of rest.

Hope and Mobilization

Here is a provisional English translation of the reflection prepared by the Quebec Group on Contextual Theology. See the French version below.

In the preceding two texts about the economic crisis (Who will help us cross the desert? April 2009; New World Coming, February, 2010. See http://gtcq.blogspot.com/), we tried to discern paths that might serve not only to come through the crisis, but also to deepen our hope. Wishing now to raise questions and to share, we finish this series of texts by proposing a reflection on the mobilizing strength of hope.

    Spontaneously, hope can be associated with waiting, and so be seen as contrary to active and committed mobilization. We believe rather that it is required for engagement: without it, why continue, especially when the results hoped for are not realized or when they are few and far between? Some interpretation is required. In a Christian perspective, it is the search for coherence between our current action and what has been promised by God for our common future. The new world comes unceasingly toward us; it awakens us and comes about through our commitments. (See the earlier texts.) In real life, how can we link the reception of this new life with the responsibility to make it bear fruit? How can we link hope and mobilization in a context of crisis and of multiple questioning?

Espérance et mobilisation

Voici la réfléxion la plus récent du groupe de théologie contextuelle québecoise.

    Dans nos deux textes précédents sur la crise (Qui nous fera traverser le désert ?, avril 2009; Voir venir un monde nouveau, février 2010. Cf. http://gtcq.blogspot.com/), nous avons cherché à discerner par quels chemins nous pourrions non seulement sortir de celle-ci, mais y approfondir notre espérance. Avec le désir de susciter questionnement et partage, nous terminons cette série de textes en proposant une réflexion sur la force mobilisatrice de l’espérance. L’espérance peut être spontanément associée à l’attente, comme en contradiction avec une mobilisation active et engagée. Nous croyons plutôt qu’elle est nécessaire à cet engagement : sans elle, pourquoi continuer, surtout lorsque les résultats attendus ne sont pas au rendez-vous ou se font rares ? Encore faut-il l’interpréter. Dans la perspective chrétienne, elle est une recherche de cohérence entre notre agir présent et ce qui est promis par Dieu pour notre avenir commun. Le monde nouveau vient sans cesse vers nous ; il se révèle et s’actualise à travers nos engagements (cf. précédents textes). Comment lier existentiellement l’accueil de cette vie nouvelle et la responsabilité de la faire fructifier ? Comment rattacher espérance et mobilisation dans un contexte de crise et de multiples remises en question ?