So, in
fact, we have governments that are deeply rooted in far-right philosophies of
authoritarianism and the supremacy of the economy. They encourage, as the
primary virtue of the citizen, the right to consume! Citizens are taken
seriously as such to the extent that they consume. The Extreme Right is made up
of groups who believe they are benefiting from this sort of authoritarian
government without realizing that, since their members come from the
less-economically benefited sectors of society, they are in fact victims of a
fascist system. (Lower ranks of the military are also very present in this
category.) Large corporations and government are satisfied to see the presence
of such Extreme Right groups since they serve to divide ordinary citizens and
weaken a grassroots opposition. They are “useful.”
All of this
plays out very well for the interests of the multinational economic interests
in delaying an effective response to climate change. These interests know very
well that climate change will deeply affect the capacity of humanity to survive
on the planet. However, they leave that for another generation to deal with,
confident that the people of their category will have ample resources to assure
the survival of their 0.1 percent of the population (around 80 million people).
These will be sufficient to guarantee a vibrant economy since the rest of the
population are, in any case, “excess,” that is to say non-consumers.
This is not
a happy picture I am painting and I do so to point out that we put our trust
governments at our own peril. Obviously, it is better to have a government that
listens seriously to its electors. But the solutions will not come from them
since they are beholden to the grand masters of the current economy. Even
though the Extreme-Right is a tiny minority, their role as a dividing force
within the ranks of the general population is important and will grow to the
extent that large sectors of the population are subjected to ever more
precarious conditions. This tiny minority needs to be taken seriously since
they voice the anger and frustration of a much larger section of the population
which are directed to turn their anger against the most vulnerable minorities
rather than the economic and political decision-makers. Somehow or other the larger population needs
to have a change of mind and heart that will lead to a greater cohesion and
solidarity in facing the issues and in shaping grassroots movements for
survival. It is extremely encouraging to see the multiplication of
citizen-based movements throughout the world who are advancing powerfully and
effectively to face the challenges of climate change.
No comments:
Post a Comment