I have just
finished reading a novel of William Faulkner – no small feat. His prose is
difficult though masterful. I had always wanted to read more of him, recognized
him for the superb writer he was and, at this point, had a bit of time to do
so. Absalom, Absalom! was a chance
but fortuitous choice. I happened to be at hand at the library! I really did
not know what to expect. It is a novel about the deep South of the
19th century (1830s to 1910), published in 1936.
A short
presentation of the plot is in order if I am to make any comments. It is the
story of Thomas Sutpen in fictional Yokapatawpha County, (Mississippi) and of his
children, especially his son, Henry. It covers the period before, during and after
the American Civil War.
The story
is told almost entirely through flashbacks provided by several persons involved
in quite different ways with what happened as Quentin, the son of a friend of
Sutpen, shares what he has heard with a Canadian (Alberta) friend in a student
residence at Harvard University around 1910. The stories do not coincide on the
facts or their interpretation and it is only toward the end of the novel that
readers can attempt to piece together their own version.
What does
not seem to be in question is that around 1830, Thomas Sutpen arrived in
Jefferson, Mississippi with a gang of slaves and a French architect. Through
sheer sweat and labour he builds a local empire symbolized by a large mansion cut
right out the swamp. He has the intention of passing this on to his son. As the
story evolves we also see how Thomas’ son, Henry, becomes the wayward son
fighting what his father had built. Ultimately all is destroyed and very
tragically. (It should be noted that the title of the Novel refers to a
biblical story of the tragic death of Absalom, son of King David. David, too,
built a small kingdom but was betrayed by his son who died tragically.)
Toward the
end of my reading, I began to ask myself why I had stuck to my reading and
finished the novel. After all, the Civil War period of US history, while
interesting, is not at all at the centre of my interests today. Then it hit me
that perhaps I could learn something from the novel about my last twelve years
in Quebec. There are similarities
between the Old South and Quebec today. Both are territories that have been
dominated for centuries by an outside force, in the case of Quebec, it would be
the political and financial interests of Anglophone Canada. Both were subjected
to a war of conquest.
The South
depended on Black slavery to maintain its economy through a system of exclusion
and oppression. How could this be true of Quebec? Today, it is immigrants who
provide much of the hard labour that sustains the economy of Quebec. At the
same time, there is a quiet racism that marginalizes them from much of the
benefits of both the economy and Quebec’s social life. Like the Blacks in the
South, they are appreciated for their music and dance, but largely kept outside
the ranks of the privileged classes. In Quebec, these recent immigrants include
Africans, Haitians and people from the Maghreb (North Africa).
There is no
worse racism than the racism that does not exist. In the Old South, there was
no question. There was racism and everyone knew it. If one was against racism,
there was a clear target. In Quebec there is no racism - officially. It is
outlawed; there are laws and regulations that clearly indicate that
discrimination is now permitted. Racism simply does not exist in the mind of Quebec.
But, of course, it does exist and it is rampant especially in the work place
and in rental housing.
At the very
end of the novel, Quentin, who has been the recipient of all the various
versions of the story of the Sutpen, lies in his bed at Harvard in 1920,
muttering to himself over and over again, speaking of the South, “I don’t hate
it! I don’t! I don’t hate it!” But of
course this is precisely his struggle, as is also that of Faulkner himself, who
places in the mouth of Shreve, the young Canadian who has heard the story from
Quentin, the prophecy that, in a thousand years, the Blacks will dominate the
world scene: a remarkable statement for one writing in the 1930s.
No comments:
Post a Comment